|
|
|
02 Feb 2020 08:14 PST
Hi!
I found your account on a comment of R3DRUNNER's journal, and I couldn't help but PM you.
I just wanna say I think it's really cool that you're open about your sexual interests and stuff, I think society at large could really benefit from knowing the difference between a pedophile and a child rapist. To at least promote a more healthy discussion without devolving into "Kill all pedophiles" immediately.
So, from one to another, thank you for being open about something so many people are afraid of being open about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 Feb 2020 08:31 PST
Re: Hi!
Howdy. Thank you very much. I definitely agree that people are very quick to demonize "pedophiles" ot of hand without even taking the time to really learn what we think and believe. As if the attraction itself somehow makes us bad people.
It's surprising, since I changed my username, I've gotten a lot more attention and 99% percent of it has been positive from like-minded people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 Feb 2020 14:09 PST
It's definitely a large case of "wrongthink". Being a pedophile doesn't hurt anyone, so it shouldn't be a problem. That's how I see it anyway. It's as if when people learn that you're attracted to younger people, your voice and your opinions are suddenly completely disregarded.
I'm glad to hear most of the PMs you get are positive though! I can only assume you attract quite a bit of attention from.. Well, all kinds of people with that kind of name. Although, I do believe a large number of people on this website are pedophiles. Slippery slope and what not I guess!
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 Feb 2020 14:16 PST
Yep, it's definitely unfortunate.
And yeah, I think there are a lot of pedos here, and even quite a few pro-contact ones
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 Feb 2020 20:41 PST
Oh yeah for sure.
What age range do you think fits best for pro-contact? Do you have a preferred range? Or am I being too forward about this? Sorry!
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 Feb 2020 23:06 PST
Nah, you're good. Kinda a couple separate questions there, both what I'm attracted to, and what I think is okay to do irl (providing less bullshit surrounding it at least.) Personally, my fave agre range is pretty broad, I quote it at 4-12 typically. I also think about 4 is the earliest one should start probably, provided the kid is gonna grow up mostly in a society similar to our current one (but without the laws and quite as much sigma hopefully.
I would say, though that I think in an ideal world, there's no age limit for risk-free pleasurable things (like giving the kid a blowjob or handjob.) Stuff that will only bring pleasure to the kid, and have no chance of hurting them. I really believe all sexual interaction with kids should be that way, just the things they're safely capable of grow with age. The reason for the distinction here is because with the significance put on sex, it'd be easy for an outside influencer to convince a kid that it was "rape" if it started before they could even remember. I think that sex needn't be any more significant than any other sort of affection, so that's silly. No one thinks hugging babies is wrong
Also, I'm not necessarily saying that it's wrong with things as they are with the laws and all that, just that it's a lot more to consider
|
|
|
|
|
|
03 Feb 2020 06:39 PST
That's around the same range as me pretty much. I usually say around 4-10 as I tend to like it a bit more on the younger side, but it's not like anything higher is off the table.
Completely agree with your ideal world example though. It's kinda nice to talk to someone whose views are very similar to mine, I have to admit. I think sexual interaction with kids can be a natural thing, and I think a lot of the children who was introduced to sexual interactions from an early age would have been fine, had society not told them that they were raped and abused.
I think - in a way - that makes them feel exactly that. When people everywhere all around them tell them that what they've gone through was terrible, and how there's no way they could ever think of it as a good thing makes them actually believe that, in some form of gaslighting.
The main argument I hear a lot from the other side is how sex is way too complicated for kids to grasp, and.. Is it really that complicated? Much like you, I see it as an affectionate thing.
But in this ideal world where - let's say - 4 is when kids start getting sexually active. Who is it with? Random adult strangers, other kids around their age, or their family?
|
|
|
|
|
|
05 Feb 2020 18:34 PST
Yeah, younger is definitly nice
Yep, I agree about the societal brainwashing too. It defiantly is a form of gas-lighting, ans it's especially bad when the "offender" is caught and sent to jail.
Yeah, I've never gotten how it's supposed to be "complicated" either
As for who it ought to be with, anyone who'll treat them right. Family, babysitter's they're close to, their friends, really anyone
Sorry for not replying before I kept forgetting. I'd love to chat with you in a more "IM" type setting. Do you have Discord or tox?
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 Feb 2020 06:15 PST
I do! Can't say I use tox all too often, heh, but here it is!
EC7C0FE4377E991CC963BF97069E45F02CA4D7F5453D190863822CEE6044575A58744BFBB4F9
|
|
|
